This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author dstufft
Recipients alex, barry, bkabrda, doko, dstufft, janssen, lemburg, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray, rkuska, vstinner
Date 2015-04-05.19:48:44
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
> No, I want to be able to easily disable the newly added
> checks in 2.7.9+ to get systems such as these behave the
> same as with 2.7.8, since without this option, people
> using these system are going to be forced to stick with
> buggy 2.7.8 systems.

Why is the monkeypatch in unacceptable? I understand why it's
unacceptable to Nick and rkuska, they are a vendor and they don't want to write when the machine operator may want to use that file, however
you're the machine operator in this case.
Date User Action Args
2015-04-05 19:48:44dstufftsetrecipients: + dstufft, lemburg, barry, doko, ncoghlan, janssen, pitrou, vstinner, alex, r.david.murray, bkabrda, rkuska
2015-04-05 19:48:44dstufftsetmessageid: <>
2015-04-05 19:48:44dstufftlinkissue23857 messages
2015-04-05 19:48:44dstufftcreate