Message 239866 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pitrou
Recipients	alex, christian.heimes, docs@python, dstufft, giampaolo.rodola, janssen, nagle, pitrou
Date	2015-04-02.00:52:15
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1427935936.06.0.694167202105.issue23843@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Not sure why you're using wrap_socket() directly. Most of the time you should be using a higher-level library instead (for example a HTTP(S) library). In any case, the doc already mentions that "Starting from Python 3.2, it can be more flexible to use SSLContext.wrap_socket() instead". I leave this open in case other people feel positively about it.

Not sure why you're using wrap_socket() directly. Most of the time you should be using a higher-level library instead (for example a HTTP(S) library).

In any case, the doc already mentions that "Starting from Python 3.2, it can be more flexible to use SSLContext.wrap_socket() instead".

I leave this open in case other people feel positively about it.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2015-04-02 00:52:16	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, janssen, nagle, giampaolo.rodola, christian.heimes, alex, docs@python, dstufft
2015-04-02 00:52:16	pitrou	set	messageid: <1427935936.06.0.694167202105.issue23843@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-04-02 00:52:15	pitrou	link	issue23843 messages
2015-04-02 00:52:15	pitrou	create