Message239815
I found the explanation of C-contiguous vs Fortran-contiguous helpful (and I've programmed in both of those languages, though granted not much :). However, based on that it is not obvious to me why having a fortran-contiguous buffer prevents it from being used in the bytes-like object contexts (though granted the order might be surprising to someone who is not thinking about the memory ordering and just assuming C).
I don't have much of an opinion on the other non-glossary-entry changes, but at a quick read I'm not sure how much clarity they add, if any. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-04-01 14:01:45 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, ezio.melotti, skrah, docs@python, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka |
2015-04-01 14:01:45 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1427896905.09.0.892062765857.issue23756@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2015-04-01 14:01:45 | r.david.murray | link | issue23756 messages |
2015-04-01 14:01:44 | r.david.murray | create | |
|