This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author serhiy.storchaka
Recipients Claudiu.Popa, berker.peksag, bignose, eric.araujo, eric.snow, martin.panter, matrixise, r.david.murray, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, yselivanov
Date 2015-03-09.08:35:21
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1425890121.91.0.324103652182.issue12916@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
My opposition against moving splitdoc() to the inspect module is not strict and I don't want to fight for it. In an case two-and-a-half votes are larger than one-and-a-half.

When you move splitdoc(), you should get rid of the use pydoc.splitdoc() in the stdlib and add DeprecatedWarning assertion to the test of pydoc.splitdoc(). The existence of pydoc.splitdoc() test is an argument to keep splitdoc() in the pydoc module.
History
Date User Action Args
2015-03-09 08:35:22serhiy.storchakasetrecipients: + serhiy.storchaka, rhettinger, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, Claudiu.Popa, bignose, eric.snow, berker.peksag, martin.panter, yselivanov, matrixise
2015-03-09 08:35:21serhiy.storchakasetmessageid: <1425890121.91.0.324103652182.issue12916@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-03-09 08:35:21serhiy.storchakalinkissue12916 messages
2015-03-09 08:35:21serhiy.storchakacreate