➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author serhiy.storchaka
Recipients rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka
Date 2015-03-01.06:15:23
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1425190523.66.0.548612558362.issue23553@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
> Wouldn't size_t always work for Py_ssize_t?

Yes. But it wouldn't work for say off_t.

The consistent way is always use size_t instead of Py_ssize_t. But this boat has sailed.
History
Date User Action Args
2015-03-01 06:15:23serhiy.storchakasetrecipients: + serhiy.storchaka, rhettinger
2015-03-01 06:15:23serhiy.storchakasetmessageid: <1425190523.66.0.548612558362.issue23553@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-03-01 06:15:23serhiy.storchakalinkissue23553 messages
2015-03-01 06:15:23serhiy.storchakacreate