Message 236747 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pitrou
Recipients	martin.panter, nikratio, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka
Date	2015-02-27.13:39:42
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1425044382.89.0.81126331591.issue23529@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
> LZMAFile now uses BufferedReader.peek(). The current implementation seems appropriate, but I am not comfortable with the current specification in the documentation, which says it is allowed to not return any useful data. What do you mean with "useful data"? peek() should always return at least one byte (except on EOF or on non-blocking streams, of course).

> LZMAFile now uses BufferedReader.peek(). The current implementation seems appropriate, but I am not comfortable with the current specification in the documentation, which says it is allowed to not return any useful data.

What do you mean with "useful data"? peek() should always return at least one byte (except on EOF or on non-blocking streams, of course).

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2015-02-27 13:39:42	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, nikratio, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka
2015-02-27 13:39:42	pitrou	set	messageid: <1425044382.89.0.81126331591.issue23529@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-02-27 13:39:42	pitrou	link	issue23529 messages
2015-02-27 13:39:42	pitrou	create