Message236605
Attached patch fixes the issue, but produces a slightly different result:
>>> timedelta(seconds=1)*0.6112295
datetime.timedelta(0, 0, 611230)
Note that C implementation is probably buggy:
>>> from datetime import *
>>> timedelta(seconds=1)*0.6112295
datetime.timedelta(0, 0, 611229)
>>> timedelta(seconds=0.6112295)
datetime.timedelta(0, 0, 611230)
See msg194311 in #8860. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-02-25 17:22:29 | belopolsky | set | recipients:
+ belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, bdkearns |
2015-02-25 17:22:28 | belopolsky | set | messageid: <1424884948.98.0.965076108938.issue23521@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2015-02-25 17:22:28 | belopolsky | link | issue23521 messages |
2015-02-25 17:22:28 | belopolsky | create | |
|