This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author NeilGirdhar
Recipients Jeff.Kaufman, Joshua.Landau, NeilGirdhar, SpaghettiToastBook, andybuckley, belopolsky, berker.peksag, eric.araujo, eric.snow, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, paul.moore, pconnell, r.david.murray, terry.reedy, twouters, zbysz
Date 2015-01-26.16:54:18
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
Could you help me understand this a bit better?

I always thought of f(x for x in l) as equivalent to f( (x for x in l) ).

So, I can see that f(*x for x in l) should be equivalent to f( (*x for x in l) ).

How should we interpret f(**x for x in l)?  Is it then f( {**x for x in l} )?
Date User Action Args
2015-01-26 16:54:18NeilGirdharsetrecipients: + NeilGirdhar, gvanrossum, twouters, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, paul.moore, ncoghlan, belopolsky, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, andybuckley, r.david.murray, zbysz, eric.snow, berker.peksag, Joshua.Landau, pconnell, Jeff.Kaufman, SpaghettiToastBook
2015-01-26 16:54:18NeilGirdharsetmessageid: <>
2015-01-26 16:54:18NeilGirdharlinkissue2292 messages
2015-01-26 16:54:18NeilGirdharcreate