This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author Rosuav
Recipients Jeff.Kaufman, Joshua.Landau, NeilGirdhar, Rosuav, SpaghettiToastBook, andybuckley, belopolsky, berker.peksag, eric.araujo, eric.snow, ezio.melotti, fdrake, fhahn, georg.brandl, giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, paul.moore, pconnell, r.david.murray, terry.reedy, twouters, zbysz
Date 2015-01-20.10:48:39
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1421750919.17.0.492962877799.issue2292@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
*facepalm* Of course I am. I don't know how I missed that in there, but maybe I was focusing too much on the abort that followed it to actually read the exception text. Duh.

But with the latest version of the patch, I'm seeing something that I'm fairly sure *is* a different failure:

gcc -pthread -c -Wno-unused-result -Wsign-compare -Wunreachable-code -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes    -Werror=declaration-after-statement   -I. -IInclude -I./Include    -DPy_BUILD_CORE -o Python/ast.o Python/ast.c
Python/ast.c: In function ‘ast_for_call’:
Python/ast.c:2433:5: error: ‘npositionals’ undeclared (first use in this function)
Python/ast.c:2433:5: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
make: *** [Python/ast.o] Error 1
History
Date User Action Args
2015-01-20 10:48:39Rosuavsetrecipients: + Rosuav, gvanrossum, fdrake, twouters, georg.brandl, terry.reedy, paul.moore, ncoghlan, belopolsky, giampaolo.rodola, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, andybuckley, r.david.murray, zbysz, eric.snow, berker.peksag, Joshua.Landau, pconnell, NeilGirdhar, Jeff.Kaufman, SpaghettiToastBook, fhahn
2015-01-20 10:48:39Rosuavsetmessageid: <1421750919.17.0.492962877799.issue2292@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-01-20 10:48:39Rosuavlinkissue2292 messages
2015-01-20 10:48:39Rosuavcreate