Message234039
Successfully reproduced the behavior playing through variations with the supplied examples (very helpful) on OS X v10.9.5 both in 2.7.9 and the default branch -- adding version 3.5 to issue.
Also successfully verified that the supplied patches do just as advertised on same: OS X v10.9.5, both 2.7.9 and default branch.
The patches' addition of a try around that for block looks like a sensible choice. At the moment, I do not yet fully understand what the patches' exception block is doing with the 'cache[job]._set' call the way it is, but I would like to spend more time to digest it better -- I hope to do so later this week. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-01-14 22:22:06 | davin | set | recipients:
+ davin, sbt, josh.r, advance512 |
2015-01-14 22:22:06 | davin | set | messageid: <1421274126.58.0.344791903071.issue23051@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2015-01-14 22:22:06 | davin | link | issue23051 messages |
2015-01-14 22:22:06 | davin | create | |
|