Message233789
> The interesting discovery I made while reviewing the patch for issue
> 22906 is that there apparently *is* implicit chaining support in
> PyErr_SetObject
Indeed, there is, and it should work properly (AFAIR there was quite a bit of debugging to make this work). Also, note that normalizing is already handled.
I'm not sure what you're witnessing that doesn't work as expected. I suspect that you may be confusing "an exception has been caught" (and is ready to be chained from) with "an exception has been raised" (i.e. PyErr_Occurred() is true). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-01-10 00:07:34 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, ncoghlan, serhiy.storchaka |
2015-01-10 00:07:34 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1420848454.08.0.909579778924.issue23188@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2015-01-10 00:07:34 | pitrou | link | issue23188 messages |
2015-01-10 00:07:33 | pitrou | create | |
|