Message 232911 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	belopolsky
Recipients	belopolsky, ethan.furman, lemburg, mdcb808@gmail.com, vstinner
Date	2014-12-18.23:28:54
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1418945334.7.0.671103752969.issue23084@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
I would say that rejection note for PEP 410 [1] and the implementation of st_[amc]time_ns fields in os.stats() have established a de-facto standard for representing nanosecond resolution timestamps in Python. I think this proposal should be rejected. [1] https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-February/116837.html

I would say that rejection note for PEP 410 [1] and the implementation of st_[amc]time_ns fields in os.stats() have established a de-facto standard for representing nanosecond resolution timestamps in Python.

I think this proposal should be rejected.

[1] https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-February/116837.html

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2014-12-18 23:28:54	belopolsky	set	recipients: + belopolsky, lemburg, vstinner, ethan.furman, mdcb808@gmail.com
2014-12-18 23:28:54	belopolsky	set	messageid: <1418945334.7.0.671103752969.issue23084@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-12-18 23:28:54	belopolsky	link	issue23084 messages
2014-12-18 23:28:54	belopolsky	create