➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pjenvey
Recipients BreamoreBoy, ncoghlan, pitrou, pjenvey
Date 2014-12-09.01:00:13
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1418086813.69.0.647529576436.issue19725@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
I can't find the paper trail of what I originally thought was a "consensus" or even that many clear pronouncements about it, but I recall Nick being originally opposed to it but he later changed his mind, you can see his approval here:

https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-May/125809.html

'It's also quite likely the "rich stat object" API will be pursued for 3.5'

https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-November/130582.html

https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-November/130588.html

Antoine seems ok w/ it, encouraging others to make it happen:

https://mail.python.org/pipermail//python-dev/2013-September/128708.html

You can probably find a bit more discussion within those threads
History
Date User Action Args
2014-12-09 01:00:13pjenveysetrecipients: + pjenvey, ncoghlan, pitrou, BreamoreBoy
2014-12-09 01:00:13pjenveysetmessageid: <1418086813.69.0.647529576436.issue19725@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-12-09 01:00:13pjenveylinkissue19725 messages
2014-12-09 01:00:13pjenveycreate