Author vstinner
Recipients Alexey.Poryadin, gvanrossum, neologix, vstinner, yselivanov
Date 2014-12-08.16:01:36
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1418054496.82.0.376962240787.issue23009@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
It's a little bit surprising to call epoll_wait() without any FD subscribed, but select([], [], [], delay) is a known way to sleep 'delay' seconds, so why not using epoll in a similar way? :-)

epoll_02.patch looks good to me. Can you please also apply the patch to the Tulip project?

(By the way, test_selectors.py to Tulip is completly different, we may just reuse the file from CPython and drop the code from Tulip.)
History
Date User Action Args
2014-12-08 16:01:36vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, gvanrossum, neologix, yselivanov, Alexey.Poryadin
2014-12-08 16:01:36vstinnersetmessageid: <1418054496.82.0.376962240787.issue23009@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-12-08 16:01:36vstinnerlinkissue23009 messages
2014-12-08 16:01:36vstinnercreate