Message 232169 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	pitrou
Recipients	geertj, giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, pitrou, sbt, vstinner, yselivanov
Date	2014-12-05.01:00:21
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1417741222.12.0.801599690328.issue22560@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
From issue 22768: """ > Maybe > transport.get_extra_info('socket').getpeercert(True) > would be okay, no patch needed? That will be problematic with issue22560. The clear-text socket object and the SSL object become unrelated, and it would be logical for get_extra_info('socket') to return the clear-text socket, so either a get_extra_info('ssl') would be needed, or we should expose the SSL properties directly as extra info members. """

From issue 22768:

"""
> Maybe
> transport.get_extra_info('socket').getpeercert(True)
> would be okay, no patch needed?

That will be problematic with issue22560. The clear-text socket object and the SSL object become unrelated, and it would be logical for get_extra_info('socket') to return the clear-text socket, so either a get_extra_info('ssl') would be needed, or we should expose the SSL properties directly as extra info members.
"""

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2014-12-05 01:00:22	pitrou	set	recipients: + pitrou, gvanrossum, geertj, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola, sbt, yselivanov
2014-12-05 01:00:22	pitrou	set	messageid: <1417741222.12.0.801599690328.issue22560@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-12-05 01:00:22	pitrou	link	issue22560 messages
2014-12-05 01:00:21	pitrou	create