➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author r.david.murray
Recipients barry, belopolsky, mitya57, r.david.murray
Date 2014-11-24.17:30:32
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1416850232.59.0.0514978182088.issue22932@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
email.utils.format_datetime uses datetime.  formatdate wasn't touched, for backward compatibility reasons.  If it has an actual bug we can fix it.

If it can be converted to use datetime without sacrificing backward compatibility, that's also fine with me.

Frankly I don't know enough at the moment to know if the proposed patch is correct.  Alexander?
History
Date User Action Args
2014-11-24 17:30:32r.david.murraysetrecipients: + r.david.murray, barry, belopolsky, mitya57
2014-11-24 17:30:32r.david.murraysetmessageid: <1416850232.59.0.0514978182088.issue22932@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-11-24 17:30:32r.david.murraylinkissue22932 messages
2014-11-24 17:30:32r.david.murraycreate