Message 230906 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	terry.reedy
Recipients	ezio.melotti, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, terry.reedy
Date	2014-11-09.20:22:55
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1415564575.7.0.358075116114.issue22823@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
My timing for set((1,2,3)) is .29, faster than for set([1,2,3]) (.42) but still slower than for {1,2,3} (.16). So I will change such instances also. The same timing for frozenset((1,2,3)) (.29) is faster than the best timing for frozenset({1,2,3}), (.36), so I will not change that unless discussed and agreed on.

My timing for set((1,2,3)) is .29, faster than for set([1,2,3]) (.42) but still slower than for {1,2,3} (.16).  So I will change such instances also.

The same timing for frozenset((1,2,3)) (.29) is faster than the best timing for frozenset({1,2,3}), (.36), so I will not change that unless discussed and agreed on.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2014-11-09 20:22:55	terry.reedy	set	recipients: + terry.reedy, rhettinger, ezio.melotti, serhiy.storchaka
2014-11-09 20:22:55	terry.reedy	set	messageid: <1415564575.7.0.358075116114.issue22823@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-11-09 20:22:55	terry.reedy	link	issue22823 messages
2014-11-09 20:22:55	terry.reedy	create