Message230779
Even though it may have been considered a private API (*), users certainly won't understand that their application just broke because of a Python patch level release upgrade, so if possible, I think the API should be added back and flagged as "private, but used by at least eventlet and gevent".
Alternatively: Why not add it back and make it an officially documented API ?
(*) The API is missing the leading underscore, so it's not really private by our usual conventions, it's just undocumented. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2014-11-07 10:08:03 | lemburg | set | recipients:
+ lemburg, barry, janssen, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, Arfrever, alex, Denis.Bilenko, dstufft |
2014-11-07 10:08:03 | lemburg | set | messageid: <1415354883.12.0.083099172568.issue22438@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2014-11-07 10:08:03 | lemburg | link | issue22438 messages |
2014-11-07 10:08:02 | lemburg | create | |
|