Message230180
Do you mean pretending there is no default “methodName” value, or pretending that the runTest() method is not invoked by discovery?
I would have to check, but I think I have relied on the runTest() method being discovered in the past, when I did not think a more original test method name was useful. Though I agree that it makes the behaviour more complicated for little extra flexibility. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2014-10-28 21:57:20 | martin.panter | set | recipients:
+ martin.panter, pitrou, rbcollins, ezio.melotti, michael.foord, docs@python, evilzero |
2014-10-28 21:57:20 | martin.panter | set | messageid: <1414533440.13.0.80113365323.issue22153@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2014-10-28 21:57:20 | martin.panter | link | issue22153 messages |
2014-10-28 21:57:20 | martin.panter | create | |
|