Author martin.panter
Recipients docs@python, evilzero, ezio.melotti, martin.panter, michael.foord, pitrou, rbcollins
Date 2014-10-28.21:57:20
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1414533440.13.0.80113365323.issue22153@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Do you mean pretending there is no default “methodName” value, or pretending that the runTest() method is not invoked by discovery?

I would have to check, but I think I have relied on the runTest() method being discovered in the past, when I did not think a more original test method name was useful. Though I agree that it makes the behaviour more complicated for little extra flexibility.
History
Date User Action Args
2014-10-28 21:57:20martin.pantersetrecipients: + martin.panter, pitrou, rbcollins, ezio.melotti, michael.foord, docs@python, evilzero
2014-10-28 21:57:20martin.pantersetmessageid: <1414533440.13.0.80113365323.issue22153@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-10-28 21:57:20martin.panterlinkissue22153 messages
2014-10-28 21:57:20martin.pantercreate