Message228499
I committed a version of this that uses Raymond's suggestion and also makes sure that the first thread is named Thread-1 as it has been in the past (there was a test failure without that fix, but I also think it makes sense for it to be Thread-1 since one would normally think of the main thread as thread 0).
I did not try to turn the test script into a test case because it would take a long time to run if it is to have a reasonable chance of displaying the bug, and it would never be a consistent failure.
Thanks, Peter; sorry it took so long to get this committed. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2014-10-04 21:50:27 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, python-dev, Peter.Saveliev |
2014-10-04 21:50:27 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1412459427.92.0.23252296883.issue11866@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2014-10-04 21:50:27 | r.david.murray | link | issue11866 messages |
2014-10-04 21:50:27 | r.david.murray | create | |
|