Author mrabarnett
Recipients akira, brg@gladman.plus.com, gladman, mark.dickinson, mrabarnett, scoder, steven.daprano, terry.reedy, vstinner, wolma
Date 2014-09-25.16:02:23
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1411660943.78.0.939285955288.issue22477@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
As it appears that there isn't general agreement on how to calculate the GCD when negative numbers are involved, I needed to look for another way of thinking about it.

Splitting off the sign as another factor was what I came up with.

Pragmatism beats purity, and all that! :-)
History
Date User Action Args
2014-09-25 16:02:23mrabarnettsetrecipients: + mrabarnett, terry.reedy, mark.dickinson, scoder, vstinner, steven.daprano, akira, wolma, gladman, brg@gladman.plus.com
2014-09-25 16:02:23mrabarnettsetmessageid: <1411660943.78.0.939285955288.issue22477@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-09-25 16:02:23mrabarnettlinkissue22477 messages
2014-09-25 16:02:23mrabarnettcreate