Message224388
> This has been fixed in 3.4.2, but shows up in the 3.4.1 documentation.
Well, I didn't want to change Python 3.4.1 documentation, but it looks like https://docs.python.org/3.4/ is updated after each commit into the 3.4 branch. For example, new asyncio functions added in 3.4.2 are already documented:
https://docs.python.org/3.4/library/asyncio-eventloop.html#asyncio.BaseEventLoop.create_task
I changeed all examples to use create_task() instaed of async() or the Task contructor:
changeset: 91609:66f06fbf8a2f
branch: 3.4
user: Victor Stinner <victor.stinner@gmail.com>
date: Tue Jul 08 12:39:10 2014 +0200
files: Doc/library/asyncio-dev.rst Doc/library/asyncio-eventloop.rst Doc/library/asyncio-stream.r
description:
Update asyncio documentation
- Document the new create_task() method
- "Hide" the Task class: point to the create_task() method for interoperability
- Rewrite the documentation of the Task class
- Document the "Pending task destroyed"
- Update output in debug mode of examples in the dev section
- Replace Task() with create_task() in examples
Maybe I should revert this change in the 3.4 branch, but mention that Python 3.4.2 and 3.5 have a new create_task() which is now the recommanded way to schedule a coroutine (to create a task object). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2014-07-31 09:04:33 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, gvanrossum, pydanny, docs@python, yselivanov |
2014-07-31 09:04:33 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1406797473.6.0.804797806084.issue22112@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2014-07-31 09:04:33 | vstinner | link | issue22112 messages |
2014-07-31 09:04:33 | vstinner | create | |
|