This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author loewis
Recipients docs@python, gpolo, loewis, martin.panter, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka, terry.reedy
Date 2014-07-30.16:09:38
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1406736578.27.0.372105411407.issue21580@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
The 2.7_2 patch looks good to me. I won't rule on the backwards compatibility implications, although I agree that this is unlikely to cause a regression (it would only if somebody updated the standard library only, *and* would use data= for PhotoImage). I'm unsure whether it was possible at all so far to use data= (with whatever argument); if you could have passed a non-buffer object successfully, this would break now.
History
Date User Action Args
2014-07-30 16:09:38loewissetrecipients: + loewis, terry.reedy, gpolo, docs@python, python-dev, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka
2014-07-30 16:09:38loewissetmessageid: <1406736578.27.0.372105411407.issue21580@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-07-30 16:09:38loewislinkissue21580 messages
2014-07-30 16:09:38loewiscreate