Author serhiy.storchaka
Recipients Claudiu.Popa, r.david.murray, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka
Date 2014-07-15.11:24:01
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1405423441.65.0.990617682871.issue18615@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
If Raymond found this feature helpful, I have no strong objection.

Only several comments:

* A named tuple is documented as having fields: type, sampling_rate, channels, frames, bits_per_sample.

* User tests in existing code return tuples. what() and whathdr() should convert result to named tuple. Changing standard tests after this is redundant.

* If we guarantee pickleability, we will stick with nametuple's name. It is not more implementation detail which we can change in any moment, all future versions of Python should have sndhdr._SndHeaders. Is it good to use underscored name?
History
Date User Action Args
2014-07-15 11:24:01serhiy.storchakasetrecipients: + serhiy.storchaka, rhettinger, r.david.murray, Claudiu.Popa
2014-07-15 11:24:01serhiy.storchakasetmessageid: <1405423441.65.0.990617682871.issue18615@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-07-15 11:24:01serhiy.storchakalinkissue18615 messages
2014-07-15 11:24:01serhiy.storchakacreate