Author skrah
Recipients h.venev, mark.dickinson, rhettinger, skrah, vstinner
Date 2014-07-05.13:32:50
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1404567170.67.0.259704640674.issue21922@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Hmm, the license (LGPL) should only matter for the Windows binaries
and we can just compile without --enable-big-digits=gmp.

Even *if* the Windows binaries were built with gmp support, it would
be sufficient for any redistributor to point to the external library
sources for gmp that the build has actually used -- your own code
does not automatically become LGPL licensed and you are under no
obligation to reveal it.


I haven't looked at the patch in detail, but I don't have any
fundamental objection against adding a configure option, provided
that the additional code is well isolated (which seems to be the
case).

Of course we'd have to set up buildbots for the option etc...
History
Date User Action Args
2014-07-05 13:32:50skrahsetrecipients: + skrah, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, vstinner, h.venev
2014-07-05 13:32:50skrahsetmessageid: <1404567170.67.0.259704640674.issue21922@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-07-05 13:32:50skrahlinkissue21922 messages
2014-07-05 13:32:50skrahcreate