Author Trip.Volpe
Recipients Trip.Volpe, ajaksu2, amaury.forgeotdarc, barry, belopolsky, eric.araujo, eric.snow, nedbat, rhettinger, terry.reedy, tshepang
Date 2014-05-19.20:34:58
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1400531699.38.0.990814440342.issue2506@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I found this issue just the other day while researching why we were getting false gaps in our test coverage reports (using Ned's coverage module, natch!). I agree that this seems like a fairly minor nuisance, but it's a nuisance that anybody who has tests and measures test coverage will run into sooner or later -- and that's *everybody*, right?

I think some kind of fix ought to be discussed. After all, "it should be possible to have accurate coverage results" is a proposition that seems fairly reasonable to me.
History
Date User Action Args
2014-05-19 20:34:59Trip.Volpesetrecipients: + Trip.Volpe, barry, rhettinger, terry.reedy, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, ajaksu2, nedbat, eric.araujo, tshepang, eric.snow
2014-05-19 20:34:59Trip.Volpesetmessageid: <1400531699.38.0.990814440342.issue2506@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-05-19 20:34:59Trip.Volpelinkissue2506 messages
2014-05-19 20:34:58Trip.Volpecreate