This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients Arfrever, alex, dstufft, ezio.melotti, mark.dickinson, neologix, pitrou, rhettinger, tim.peters, vstinner
Date 2014-05-12.23:41:22
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1399938080.2339.31.camel@fsol>
In-reply-to <1399937752.18.0.0201962181488.issue21470@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> The theoretical properties that make the Twister so attractive were
> all proved based on mathematical analysis of its entire period.  The
> only way to get at the whole period is to allow for all possible
> seeds.
> 
> If the seeds Python can use are drawn from a relatively tiny subset of
> the possible seeds, nothing can be said about most of the "proved
> correct" properties anymore.  Maybe they still hold.  Maybe they
> don't.  In the absence of analysis (which, AFAIK, is still too
> difficult to do), the only way to be safe is to refrain from being so
> bloody "clever" in the interest of saving a few microseconds.

Thanks for the explanation. It's much clearer now.
History
Date User Action Args
2014-05-12 23:41:23pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, tim.peters, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, vstinner, ezio.melotti, Arfrever, alex, neologix, dstufft
2014-05-12 23:41:23pitroulinkissue21470 messages
2014-05-12 23:41:22pitroucreate