Message 217235 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	vstinner
Recipients	akira, shankarunni, vstinner, yselivanov
Date	2014-04-27.00:36:47
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<CAMpsgwZjSLz2dcFfyJxdU8_dJm+P8MTRN4gG3pkwmME=1Dxbyw@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to	<1398558404.11.0.140799587927.issue21302@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
2014-04-27 2:26 GMT+02:00 Shankar Unni <report@bugs.python.org>: >> If you want to modify time.sleep(), you must be careful of the portability: Windows, Linux, but also Mac OS X, FreeBSD, Solaris, etc. > > Oh, I totally agree. What I'm trying to do is to define another autoconf flag (HAVE_CLOCK_NANOSLEEP), that does a feature test and enable that flag, and just use that if available. I'm talking about the expected behaviour which can be found in the documentation of the function: https://docs.python.org/dev/library/time.html#time.sleep

2014-04-27 2:26 GMT+02:00 Shankar Unni <report@bugs.python.org>:
>> If you want to modify time.sleep(), you must be careful of the portability: Windows, Linux, but also Mac OS X, FreeBSD, Solaris, etc.
>
> Oh, I totally agree. What I'm trying to do is to define another autoconf flag (HAVE_CLOCK_NANOSLEEP), that does a feature test and enable that flag, and just use that if available.

I'm talking about the expected behaviour which can be found in the
documentation of the function:
https://docs.python.org/dev/library/time.html#time.sleep

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2014-04-27 00:36:47	vstinner	set	recipients: + vstinner, akira, yselivanov, shankarunni
2014-04-27 00:36:47	vstinner	link	issue21302 messages
2014-04-27 00:36:47	vstinner	create