Author pitrou
Recipients akira, asvetlov, christian.heimes, giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, josh.r, josiah.carlson, neologix, pitrou, rosslagerwall, yselivanov
Date 2014-04-25.01:10:53
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1398388254.29.0.630511539765.issue17552@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> I'm -1 about adding "count" *and* "blocksize" parameters. "blocksize" > alone is good enough IMO and considering what I've just described it
> is a better name than "count".

I'm confused. Why is "blocksize" necessary at all?

> using os.path.getsize(file.name) looks risky to me

Why not fstat(fd) ?
History
Date User Action Args
2014-04-25 01:10:54pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, gvanrossum, giampaolo.rodola, christian.heimes, josiah.carlson, asvetlov, neologix, akira, rosslagerwall, yselivanov, josh.r
2014-04-25 01:10:54pitrousetmessageid: <1398388254.29.0.630511539765.issue17552@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-04-25 01:10:54pitroulinkissue17552 messages
2014-04-25 01:10:54pitroucreate