Author pitrou
Recipients Arfrever, alex, benjamin.peterson, christian.heimes, dstufft, ezio.melotti, lemburg, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray, vstinner
Date 2014-03-21.13:11:11
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1395407471.91.0.549271962422.issue20995@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I think the proposed cipher string is still overly complicated and tedious to maintain. The following seems to achieve similar results:

'EECDH+AESGCM:DH+AESGCM:ECDH:DH:HIGH:!aNULL:!eNULL:!MD5:!DSS:!LOW:!EXPORT'

Also, as Marc-André points out, we probably shouldn't ban RC4 even from the so-called "restricted ciphers".
History
Date User Action Args
2014-03-21 13:11:11pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, lemburg, ncoghlan, vstinner, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, Arfrever, alex, r.david.murray, dstufft
2014-03-21 13:11:11pitrousetmessageid: <1395407471.91.0.549271962422.issue20995@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-03-21 13:11:11pitroulinkissue20995 messages
2014-03-21 13:11:11pitroucreate