Author dstufft
Recipients Arfrever, alex, benjamin.peterson, christian.heimes, dstufft, ezio.melotti, lemburg, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray, vstinner
Date 2014-03-21.00:35:29
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1395362129.38.0.59179446453.issue20995@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> Again: the point is maintenance later, not breakage now.

Ok, well I don't agree that it's more maintenance later to be explicit and not include HIGH, but whatever it's not insecure at the moment so.

Attached is a patch against 3.5 for folks to review.
History
Date User Action Args
2014-03-21 00:35:29dstufftsetrecipients: + dstufft, lemburg, ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, Arfrever, alex, r.david.murray
2014-03-21 00:35:29dstufftsetmessageid: <1395362129.38.0.59179446453.issue20995@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-03-21 00:35:29dstufftlinkissue20995 messages
2014-03-21 00:35:29dstufftcreate