This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author sean.rodman
Recipients docs@python, r.david.murray, rogererens, sean.rodman
Date 2014-02-18.18:09:41
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1392746982.51.0.295961546529.issue20628@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Ok, I have take the approach I used with the original patch and applied it to this one, listing that fieldnames is a sequence. Then, I added a link to the collections abstract on that instance of the word sequence. I did this for both DictReader and DictWriter as I did in the original patch. Would this be what you think is needed?
History
Date User Action Args
2014-02-18 18:09:42sean.rodmansetrecipients: + sean.rodman, rogererens, r.david.murray, docs@python
2014-02-18 18:09:42sean.rodmansetmessageid: <1392746982.51.0.295961546529.issue20628@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-02-18 18:09:42sean.rodmanlinkissue20628 messages
2014-02-18 18:09:42sean.rodmancreate