Author larry
Recipients benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, larry, ncoghlan, pitrou, python-dev, scoder, terry.reedy, yselivanov
Date 2014-02-03.08:45:57
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1391417157.42.0.336317136734.issue17159@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> What I'm saying is that the existing function introspection API
> would have provided a much better way to do these things,
> and that it's good to finally have the meta data available in the
> source code so that that API can be made available at some point.

What "existing function introspection API"?  I wasn't aware there was an existing mechanism to provide signature metadata for builtin functions.
History
Date User Action Args
2014-02-03 08:45:57larrysetrecipients: + larry, terry.reedy, ncoghlan, pitrou, scoder, benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, python-dev, yselivanov
2014-02-03 08:45:57larrysetmessageid: <1391417157.42.0.336317136734.issue17159@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-02-03 08:45:57larrylinkissue17159 messages
2014-02-03 08:45:57larrycreate