Author neologix
Recipients eric.snow, georg.brandl, gvanrossum, neologix, pitrou, python-dev, vstinner
Date 2014-02-02.22:33:23
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1391380403.35.0.200555591078.issue20311@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> > Once again: a slight early wakeup isn't an issue
>
> That's your opinion, but I disagree.
>
> Please open a new issue with a patch, or reopen at least this issue because it is now closed.
>
> I already spent to much time on this issue. Buildbots are now happy, I don't want to change this again.

So, to sum up:
- you write a fragile and unelegant patch without a good reason
- you commit it without review
- you're asked several times to provide an example of the problems your patch is supposed to solve, but don't give any
- you don't take into account the fact that all proven and successful event loops work just fine without a similar patch
- you insist, and won't neither back your claims by examples, nor revert your patch

Fine, keep it this way, but I'm done with this, I've lost enough time.
History
Date User Action Args
2014-02-02 22:33:23neologixsetrecipients: + neologix, gvanrossum, georg.brandl, pitrou, vstinner, python-dev, eric.snow
2014-02-02 22:33:23neologixsetmessageid: <1391380403.35.0.200555591078.issue20311@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-02-02 22:33:23neologixlinkissue20311 messages
2014-02-02 22:33:23neologixcreate