Message209936
Heh, my initial reaction based on the issue title was the same as Eric's, but yes, I agree the pure text manipulation proposed in the patch is actually a good fit.
Rather than "reverse_name" (which I feel is ambiguous about whether or not it does the DNS lookup to resolve back to the canonical name for the address), I would suggest the attribute name "reverse_pointer" or "reverse_record" (with a slight preference for the former, as indicated in the updated issue title). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2014-02-02 01:47:50 | ncoghlan | set | recipients:
+ ncoghlan, eric.smith, pmoody, leonn |
2014-02-02 01:47:50 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1391305670.08.0.320516121347.issue20480@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2014-02-02 01:47:50 | ncoghlan | link | issue20480 messages |
2014-02-02 01:47:49 | ncoghlan | create | |
|