Message209923
Those are C level descriptors, so we'd have to add new fields to the structs, and that's not going to happen at this stage of the release cycle.
However, there's also the fact that tp_new and tp_init are required to have the *same* signature, and those override the apparent signature of __call__ on the metaclass, so it's actually better to just document it once on the class. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2014-02-01 22:46:42 | ncoghlan | set | recipients:
+ ncoghlan, larry, yselivanov |
2014-02-01 22:46:41 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1391294801.85.0.173548984656.issue20473@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2014-02-01 22:46:41 | ncoghlan | link | issue20473 messages |
2014-02-01 22:46:41 | ncoghlan | create | |
|