➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author MLModel
Recipients MLModel, gennad, ncoghlan
Date 2014-01-01.14:02:30
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1388584950.88.0.567436397945.issue20077@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
Patch looks good to me. I like the choice to drop the parens. This is my first time reviewing a change; did I go through the right mechanics? I clicked Review on the issue's patch, looked at the diff, and a published a message similar to this one. Was I supposed to do something else? Is that message what "Review" is looking for? Was the "Please review" directed at me? Am I supposed to make a comment like "looks good" here? do something else?
History
Date User Action Args
2014-01-01 14:02:31MLModelsetrecipients: + MLModel, ncoghlan, gennad
2014-01-01 14:02:30MLModelsetmessageid: <1388584950.88.0.567436397945.issue20077@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2014-01-01 14:02:30MLModellinkissue20077 messages
2014-01-01 14:02:30MLModelcreate