Message205676
Ok, here is the second (modified patch) which contains a script so that no modifications are required to existing tests.
I am uploading it as a second patch, so that the first one is left as a reference.
As a sidenote, I fail to see convincing reasons for why we would want the second solution more than the first. The first one looks cleaner to my eyes. The only downside I can see to the original approach is breaking a couple of tests, which is something that can be fixed easily without even making it to the repo (running the tests in 2-3 could help find all possible broken tests beforehand).
Could someone explain to me why the second solution is more desirable? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-12-09 11:13:13 | Fotis.Koutoulakis | set | recipients:
+ Fotis.Koutoulakis, ncoghlan, ezio.melotti, docs@python, serhiy.storchaka, seydou |
2013-12-09 11:13:13 | Fotis.Koutoulakis | set | messageid: <1386587593.23.0.413131823195.issue18576@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-12-09 11:13:13 | Fotis.Koutoulakis | link | issue18576 messages |
2013-12-09 11:13:13 | Fotis.Koutoulakis | create | |
|