Message205281
I have run into this a few times although it is only recently that I've convinced myself I understood the XML namespace spec well enough to know what the right behavior was. (I came to the same interpretation as silverbacknet.)
I have attached a patch which I believe fixes (and tests) the problem. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-12-05 08:29:34 | wiml | set | recipients:
+ wiml, silverbacknet |
2013-12-05 08:29:34 | wiml | set | messageid: <1386232174.77.0.313949566116.issue17088@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-12-05 08:29:34 | wiml | link | issue17088 messages |
2013-12-05 08:29:34 | wiml | create | |
|