Author neologix
Recipients arigo, giampaolo.rodola, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, koobs, neologix, pitrou, sbt, vstinner
Date 2013-12-01.11:33:45
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAH_1eM1xc6G2sR-MNbNJ1BF6cPSKHiE8pTD1-dvjemO6dZnuMw@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1385894817.2297.8.camel@fsol>
Content
> Well this is wishing thinking, since by returning an empty list you
> force the user to handle EINTR - just in a different way.

I know that returning an empty list changes the semantics: I just
think that's better - or not as bad - than the current possibility of
having any single piece of code possibly die upon EINTR.

If you want to implement retry with timeout re-computation, I'm not
the one to who must be convinced :-)

(BTW, if we go this way, then time.sleep() should probably also be
fixed to retry upon EINTR).
History
Date User Action Args
2013-12-01 11:33:46neologixsetrecipients: + neologix, gvanrossum, arigo, gregory.p.smith, pitrou, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola, sbt, koobs
2013-12-01 11:33:45neologixlinkissue18885 messages
2013-12-01 11:33:45neologixcreate