This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author gvanrossum
Recipients eric.araujo, eric.snow, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, martin.panter, pitrou, vstinner
Date 2013-11-22.19:55:33
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAP7+vJJS=PBhJvFb7wwYj=jabUN9v_Sm0ot+=65s5KempHJRkQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1385149649.34.0.213841336014.issue19291@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
OK. I accidentally committed the patch. Will move the three modules to the
ipc section now.

On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Eric Snow <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:

>
> Eric Snow added the comment:
>
> I was thinking the same thing as Antoine.  18 fits in more closely to what
> I understand is the purpose of asyncio (the focus on IO).
>
> ----------
> nosy: +eric.snow
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue19291>
> _______________________________________
>
History
Date User Action Args
2013-11-22 19:55:33gvanrossumsetrecipients: + gvanrossum, georg.brandl, pitrou, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, eric.snow, martin.panter
2013-11-22 19:55:33gvanrossumlinkissue19291 messages
2013-11-22 19:55:33gvanrossumcreate