Message203618
How about "ExName"?
This patch:
PyRun_AnyFileExName
PyRun_SimpleFileExName
PyRun_InteractiveOneExName
PyRun_InteractiveLoopExName
PyRun_FileExName
Previous patch:
Py_CompileStringExName
PyAST_FromNodeExName
PyAST_CompileExName
PyFuture_FromASTExName
PyParser_ParseFileExName
PyParser_ParseStringExName
PyErr_SyntaxLocationExName
PyErr_ProgramTextExName
PyParser_ASTFromStringExName
PyParser_ASTFromFileExName
- "Ex" has precedent as indicating a largely functionally equivalent API with a different signature
- "Name" suggests strongly that we're tinkering with the filename (since this APIs don't accept another name)
- "ExName" is the same length as "Object" but far more explicit
Thoughts? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-11-21 12:04:49 | ncoghlan | set | recipients:
+ ncoghlan, georg.brandl, vstinner, Arfrever, eric.snow, serhiy.storchaka |
2013-11-21 12:04:49 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1385035489.39.0.958202018909.issue19518@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-11-21 12:04:49 | ncoghlan | link | issue19518 messages |
2013-11-21 12:04:49 | ncoghlan | create | |
|