Message203314
That's not a good name for the flag. The problem is that 'read-only' means different things on Windows than it does on Unix. Which is why I suggested that the flag control whether or not it acts "posix like" on Windows. So perhaps 'posix_compat'? That feels a bit odd, though, since on posix it does nothing...so it's really about behavioral consistency across platforms....
Hmm. It's really hard to think of a name that conveys succinctly what we are talking about here.
A more radical notion would be something like 'delete_control' and have it be tri-valued: 'unixlike', 'windowslike', and 'native', with the default being native. Bad names, most likely, but you get the idea. The disadvantage is that it would be even more code to implement ;) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-11-18 19:24:13 | r.david.murray | set | recipients:
+ r.david.murray, tim.golden, zach.ware, ivan.radic |
2013-11-18 19:24:13 | r.david.murray | set | messageid: <1384802653.85.0.680450566707.issue19643@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-11-18 19:24:13 | r.david.murray | link | issue19643 messages |
2013-11-18 19:24:13 | r.david.murray | create | |
|