Author ncoghlan
Recipients Jim.Jewett, Trundle, Yury.Selivanov, barry, benjamin.peterson, cvrebert, daniel.urban, eric.araujo, ethan.furman, gcbirzan, gvanrossum, jamesh, ncoghlan, pitrou, yorik.sar
Date 2013-11-03.12:36:15
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1383482175.66.0.921738404914.issue12029@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
A point on the safety/correctness front: I remembered we already run arbitrary code at roughly this point in the eval loop, as we have to invoke __iter__ to get the exceptions to check when an iterable is used in except clause.

That means allowing the subclass check hooks to run here isn't as radical a change as I first thought.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-11-03 12:36:15ncoghlansetrecipients: + ncoghlan, gvanrossum, barry, jamesh, pitrou, benjamin.peterson, eric.araujo, Trundle, cvrebert, daniel.urban, yorik.sar, ethan.furman, Yury.Selivanov, Jim.Jewett, gcbirzan
2013-11-03 12:36:15ncoghlansetmessageid: <1383482175.66.0.921738404914.issue12029@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-11-03 12:36:15ncoghlanlinkissue12029 messages
2013-11-03 12:36:15ncoghlancreate