Author neologix
Recipients Arfrever, DLitz, aliles, amaury.forgeotdarc, asvetlov, christian.heimes, georg.brandl, grahamd, gregory.p.smith, jcea, lemburg, neologix, pitrou, sbt, twouters, vstinner
Date 2013-10-21.20:47:56
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAH_1eM0E-+Rn1Aqb6uiUosFZQ5c7=gS1A0v4qPiRXu_8igi8=A@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1382381412.71.0.394561229043.issue16500@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> Well it is customary for callback-based APIs to hold strong references to their callbacks. If a library wants to avoid leaks, it should register a single callback which will then walk the current "live" resources and protect them.

I guess that the custom usage makes sense.
I'd just like a note in the doc, if possible ;-)
History
Date User Action Args
2013-10-21 20:47:56neologixsetrecipients: + neologix, lemburg, twouters, georg.brandl, gregory.p.smith, jcea, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, vstinner, christian.heimes, grahamd, Arfrever, asvetlov, sbt, aliles, DLitz
2013-10-21 20:47:56neologixlinkissue16500 messages
2013-10-21 20:47:56neologixcreate