Author DLitz
Recipients Arfrever, DLitz, aliles, amaury.forgeotdarc, asvetlov, christian.heimes, georg.brandl, grahamd, gregory.p.smith, jcea, lemburg, neologix, pitrou, sbt, twouters, vstinner
Date 2013-10-21.13:42:46
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
> The main question is whether a failed prepare callback should prevent the fork from happenning

Yes, I think an exception should prevent the fork from happening.

It's fail-safe for the PRNG case (you can guarantee that a fork won't occur without properly re-seeding a PRNG), and it makes bugs easier to catch in unit testing.
Date User Action Args
2013-10-21 13:42:46DLitzsetrecipients: + DLitz, lemburg, twouters, georg.brandl, gregory.p.smith, jcea, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, vstinner, christian.heimes, grahamd, Arfrever, asvetlov, neologix, sbt, aliles
2013-10-21 13:42:46DLitzsetmessageid: <>
2013-10-21 13:42:46DLitzlinkissue16500 messages
2013-10-21 13:42:46DLitzcreate