This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author glyph
Recipients arjennienhuis, barry, benjamin.peterson, christian.heimes, durin42, ecir.hana, eric.smith, exarkun, ezio.melotti, flox, glyph, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, loewis, martin.panter,, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, stendec, terry.reedy, uau, vstinner
Date 2013-10-08.22:19:13
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
On Oct 8, 2013, at 2:35 PM, Eric V. Smith wrote:

> What proposal is actually on the table here?

Sorry Eric, you're right, there is too much discussion here.  This issue ought to be about .format, like the title says.  There should be a separate ticket for %-formatting, since it seems to be an almost wholly unrelated task.  While I'm sympathetic to Mercurial's issues, they're somewhat different from Twisted's, in that we're willing to adopt the "one new way" to do things in order to achieve compatibility whereas that would be too hard for Mercurial.
Date User Action Args
2013-10-08 22:19:14glyphsetrecipients: + glyph, gvanrossum, loewis, barry, terry.reedy, gregory.p.smith, exarkun, pitrou, vstinner, eric.smith, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, durin42, arjennienhuis, flox, ecir.hana, uau, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka,, stendec
2013-10-08 22:19:14glyphlinkissue3982 messages
2013-10-08 22:19:13glyphcreate