Message198347
> My specific suggestion was aimed at 3.4 - I think reporting the failure to
> flush stdout on stderr is the right thing to do (since data may have been
> lost and people can suppress it by closing stdout early, including in an
> atexit handler), but I also think it's worth improving the error message in
> the specific case of a broken pipe error.
How would you improve it? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-09-23 23:05:56 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, terry.reedy, ncoghlan, ulidtko, Jeremy.Fishman |
2013-09-23 23:05:55 | pitrou | link | issue11380 messages |
2013-09-23 23:05:55 | pitrou | create | |
|