Message198208
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Nick Coghlan <report@bugs.python.org>wrote:
>
> Nick Coghlan added the comment:
>
> Right, the minimum change needed is to prefix it with an underscore, but if
> it isn't actually needed for anything, we may as well remove it entirely.
>
Just to be clear - do we consider all non-prefixed-with-underscore
attributes of classes in the stdlib part of the public API, even when
they're explicitly undocumented? And while we're at it, all
non-prefixed-with-underscore methods as well?
I still consider this refactoring gratuitious at this point. The API is
well defined by the documentation. All the rest is implementation details. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-09-21 14:47:30 | eli.bendersky | set | recipients:
+ eli.bendersky, ncoghlan, scoder, serhiy.storchaka |
2013-09-21 14:47:30 | eli.bendersky | link | issue18990 messages |
2013-09-21 14:47:30 | eli.bendersky | create | |
|