Message198161
> > So why not simply use BufferedReader?
>
> Because we want good performance LZMAFile and compatibility with older
> versions.
You're reading me wrong. I'm simply suggesting that users interested in
readline() performance wrap LZMAFile in a BufferedReader. The
documentation can mention it.
> And I guess that it will be even faster than wrapping in
> BufferedReader (due to the avoiding of double buffering).
Let's wait for the numbers, then. The performance increase would have to
be quite large to justify such code duplication. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-09-20 18:53:39 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, rhettinger, vstinner, nadeem.vawda, eric.araujo, Arfrever, serhiy.storchaka, Michael.Fox |
2013-09-20 18:53:39 | pitrou | link | issue18003 messages |
2013-09-20 18:53:38 | pitrou | create | |
|